| The following is a summary of various research, studies and evaluations that were conducted on the program: |
Independent Evaluations |
November 2006 Duncan & Associates, Western Kentucky University David F. Duncan, President, Clinical Associate Professor of Medical Science, Brown University Thomas Nicholson, Co-Investigator Professor, Western Kentucky University |
Executive Summary: |
|
November 2004 Southern Illinois University Carbondale Bart J. Hammig Ph.D., MPH, Co-Investigator Assistant Professor of Health Education David A. Birch, Ph.D., CHES, FAAHE, FASHA, Co-Investigator Professor and Chair Department of Health Education and Recreation |
The primary purpose of this project was to evaluate the third and fifth grade components of The Great Body Shop (GBS) school health education curriculum. Specifically, the evaluation assessed students’ acquisition of health knowledge, values, learning skills, thinking skills and behaviors that are addressed in the curriculum. |
Primary Findings from the Executive Summary |
|
November 2003 Evaluation of the Chicago Comprehensive School Health Education Curriculum Report of Year 2 Findings reported by Child Health Data Lab of Children’s Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL |
The major findings include: |
|
1999 - The Impact of THE GREAT BODY SHOP on Student Health Risk Behaviors and Other Risk and Protective Factors Using the Minnesota Student Survey |
| David S. Robinson, Ed.D., Director, CERCA (The Center for Evaluation and Research with Children and Adolescents of the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children) |
Using data collected from the Minnesota Student Survey, the study compared 6th graders who received THE GREAT BODY SHOP curriculum to those 6th graders who had no exposure to THE GREAT BODY SHOP IN TWO DIFFERENT YEARS, 1995 AND 1998. |
Primary research questions were:
|
RESULTS:
|
National and State-wide Recognition |
November 2005 Office of Juvenal Justice And Delinquency Prevention Model Programs Guide |
| THE GREAT BODY SHOP was recognized by the OJJDP Model Programs as a Promising Program in 2005. Our newest research is currently being reviewed by OJJDP committee for consideration as a Model Program. For more information on THE GREAT BODY SHOP as a Best Practice, visit the OJJDP web site: www.dsgonline.com |
January 2004 - California State Department of Education |
| The State Board of Education has approved THE GREAT BODY SHOP as a promising program. Districts may use DATE, TUPE, Safe and Drug Free Schools funding to purchase our program. If you would like a copy of the waiver to submit to the state, just contact us and we will fax or e-mail you a completed waiver. All you have to do is enter your district information and mail the form. |
November 2003 - SAMHSA Model Programs |
| THE GREAT BODY SHOP was recognized by the National Registry of Effective Programs as a Promising Program in 2003. SAMHSA describes Promising Programs as those that have been implemented and evaluated sufficiently and are considered to be scientifically defensible. |
October, 2002 – What’s Working Best Practice |
| Action for Healthy Kids |
THE GREAT BODY SHOP was chosen at the Healthy Schools Summit to be included on the list containing “selected profiles of successful programs and initiatives already in practice that support children’s fitness and nutrition in and around the school environment”. (More about Action for Healthy Kids on the web at www.actionforhealthykids.org) |
August, 2002-Safe and Sound Best Practice |
| An Educational Leader’s Guide to Evidence-Based Social and Emotional Learning Programs Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning (CASEL) |
THE GREAT BODY SHOP was one of 87 different programs rated. It achieved the highest level score for promoting self-management and responsible decision-making, providing professional development, providing student assessment measures, and fostering family partnerships. The program was also rated as promising in the areas of self-awareness, social awareness, relationship skills, classroom implementation tools, school-wide coordination, and community partnerships. |
June 2000 – Safe, Disciplined, and Drug-Free Schools Expert Panel |
School districts may apply for a waiver from their state to use THE GREAT BODY SHOP with the Safe and Drug Free monies. According to PL 107-110 Title IV Part A Subpart 1 Section 4115 Authorized Activities (a)(3) WAIVER- A local educational agency may apply to the State for a waiver of the requirement of subsection (a)(1)(C) to allow innovative activities or programs that demonstrate substantial likelihood of success. http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02/index.html |
1999 - Making the Grade – A Guide to School Drug Prevention Programs |
| Drug Stategies |
Making the Grade was based on a review of national drug prevention curriculum materials using detailed assessment systems for collecting information about family components and about measures used by all the 50 curricula in the study to promote fidelity of implementation. |
THE GREAT BODY SHOP was rated in the top 10 programs nationally in overall quality, in the top 3 in awareness and resistance skills, and the top 2 in decision making and skill building. |
School Studies |
1999-2000 Pre-test/Post-test Results Curriculum and Assessment Department Everett Public Schools, Everett, Washington |
![]() |
While pre-test scores varied greatly, the average gains made by each grade level were significant and remarkably similar. |
1993-94 Comprehensive Review of the Hopkins K-12 Health Curriculum |
| Minnesota Department of Education |
Data complied from the Minnesota Assessment Test in Health at Grades 4,8,11: |
Fourth graders scored (only group tested that used THE GREAT BODY SHOP)
|
| Evaluators’ summary stated: The strong grade four performance scores suggest a successful implementation of the newly adopted K-6 THE GREAT BODY SHOP health curriculum. |
1994 - 1997 Measured Performance Gain in Comprehensive Health Education Andover School District, Andover, MA |
Analysis of 2,500-student pre/post test results for Kindergarten through sixth grade
|
| Evaluators’ summary stated: over all pre-test performance levels were higher in '96-'97 than in '96-'95; while 95-'96 results were better than '94-'95, reflecting the previous year’s use of the program. Program continued to show statistically significant gains in health knowledge, values and behaviors. |
1996 PRIDE Questionnaire Report for Clarkstown Central School District, NY |
|
| Evaluators noted that Clarkstown Central Schools showed a significantly lower use of tobacco, alcohol and drug use at the fifth grade level, than comparable school districts. Clarkstown Central Schools Health Coordinator attributes the findings to the district's implementation of THE GREAT BODY SHOP. |
1994 - 1996 Texas A&M University Study Texas A&M University, College of Education |
|
| Evaluators’ summary stated: Although THEGREAT BODY SHOP was not the focus of the evaluation, project managers did notice that the curriculum had unexpected positive effects in both of the participating project districts. These effects included improved student learning and increased parental involvement. |
1997 - 1998 Idaho Parent Report The Health Council Boise, Idaho |
|
| Evaluators' summary stated: THE GREAT BODY SHOP was given favorable reviews by parents who indicated that the program was responsible for increased family discussions on health topics, positive changes in family behaviors. |
In-house Research |
1997-98 Annual Teacher’s Survey The Children’s Health Market, Inc. |
Over 10,000 surveys are distributed annually to randomly selected educators using THE GREAT BODY SHOP. Urban, suburban and rural areas are surveyed. Teachers use Pre/Post test results, Performance Assessment Sheets, and Teacher Observations to document responses to the survey. Of the teachers who responded to the survey... |
|
|
Independent Evaluations |
National and State-wide Studies School Studies | In-House Research |